SSBCI capital deployment by state
How much of its State Small Business Credit Initiative allocation each state, the District of Columbia and each territory has deployed, how that compares with the dollars Treasury has disbursed to it, and how the picture moved over the last two quarters — for all 56 jurisdictions Treasury reports on. Every figure is computed from Treasury’s quarterly reports, and the whole table is downloadable.
Reporting period: cumulative through March 31, 2026 (Treasury report posted July 9, 2026). 56 jurisdictions: 50 states, DC, 5 territories; Tribal governments excluded (Treasury publishes their allocations only). “Deployed” is Treasury’s expended, obligated or transferred measure. Published 5 September 2026 · Version 1. Refreshed at each Treasury quarterly report; earlier snapshots stay downloadable.
Scale and pace are different questions
A state can lead on dollars deployed and sit mid-table on the share of its allocation, or the reverse. Both rankings are shown throughout; neither is a “best state” score. Every statement below is computed from Treasury’s tables — the method and its limits are set out further down.
Share of allocation deployed, 50 states and DC
Sorted from the highest share to the lowest. The dashed line is the combined figure for the 51. Territories are charted with the states in the scale-against-pace view below and tabled separately.
Allocation size against share deployed
Allocations run from about $57 million (the statutory minimum) to $1.18bn. The minimum-allocation group spans the whole range of deployment shares, which is why the two rankings on this page disagree so often.
All 50 states and DC, as of March 31, 2026
Dollar columns are Treasury’s cells; the percentage, remaining allocation, both ranks, the quarter change and the months column are computed. Rank by % orders jurisdictions by the share of allocation deployed; rank by $ by dollars deployed. Remaining allocation is allocation minus deployed — it is not undisbursed cash.
Scroll sideways for all columns →
| 1 | Alaska | $59,905,891 | $59,905,891 | $59,488,946 | 99.3% | $416,945 | 16 | +1.1 | 42.1 |
| 2 | Montana | $61,327,969 | $61,327,969 | $59,739,546 | 97.4% | $1,588,423 | 15 | +2.2 | 43.8 |
| 3 | New Hampshire | $61,468,436 | $61,468,436 | $56,385,519 | 91.7% | $5,082,917 | 18 | +0.3 | 46.0 |
| 4 | Maine | $62,232,918 | $62,232,918 | $53,724,787 | 86.3% | $8,508,131 | 22 | +2.5 | 45.0 |
| 5 | Idaho | $65,677,548 | $64,702,291 | $55,567,247 | 84.6% | $10,110,301 | 20 | +6.8 | 42.3 |
| 6 | North Carolina | $201,897,680 | $165,309,034 | $165,306,673 | 81.9% | $36,591,007 | 5 | +0.0 | 44.2 |
| 7 | Vermont | $57,947,977 | $57,947,977 | $43,254,769 | 74.6% | $14,693,208 | 27 | +1.1 | 44.4 |
| 8 | West Virginia | $72,104,798 | $46,705,930 | $46,705,930 | 64.8% | $25,398,868 | 24 | +0.0 | 46.2 |
| 9 | Florida | $488,486,572 | $313,257,735 | $313,257,735 | 64.1% | $175,228,837 | 2 | +2.4 | 41.1 |
| 10 | South Carolina | $101,342,659 | $64,624,044 | $64,623,929 | 63.8% | $36,718,730 | 12 | +1.9 | 45.7 |
| 11 | California | $1,181,997,613 | $1,174,997,613 | $743,039,879 | 62.9% | $438,957,734 | 1 | +1.4 | 42.4 |
| 12 | Utah | $69,006,000 | $69,006,000 | $42,162,124 | 61.1% | $26,843,876 | 28 | +0.3 | 41.2 |
| 13 | North Dakota | $58,641,843 | $38,569,622 | $34,003,335 | 58.0% | $24,638,508 | 37 | +0.9 | 41.6 |
| 14 | Kansas | $69,596,847 | $45,190,256 | $37,872,284 | 54.4% | $31,724,563 | 32 | +1.1 | 46.0 |
| 15 | Georgia | $199,616,860 | $127,194,892 | $107,265,772 | 53.7% | $92,351,088 | 8 | +5.3 | 40.8 |
| 16 | Kentucky | $117,122,549 | $75,347,741 | $61,222,337 | 52.3% | $55,900,212 | 14 | +8.0 | 37.4 |
| 17 | Illinois | $354,626,570 | $230,005,724 | $179,551,646 | 50.6% | $175,074,924 | 4 | +2.9 | 39.9 |
| 18 | Michigan | $236,990,950 | $150,574,451 | $118,048,147 | 49.8% | $118,942,803 | 7 | +4.3 | 46.4 |
| 19 | Arizona | $111,031,354 | $69,748,246 | $53,916,647 | 48.6% | $57,114,707 | 21 | +2.3 | 45.5 |
| 20 | Ohio | $182,347,892 | $116,599,695 | $88,018,791 † | 48.3% | $94,329,101 | 9 | +0.2 | 42.1 |
| 21 | Connecticut | $119,414,934 | $77,809,814 | $56,016,928 | 46.9% | $63,398,006 | 19 | +4.3 | 45.5 |
| 22 | Pennsylvania | $267,838,132 | $173,371,255 | $125,137,443 | 46.7% | $142,700,689 | 6 | +3.7 | 44.4 |
| 23 | Rhode Island | $61,726,320 | $40,433,719 | $27,832,514 | 45.1% | $33,893,806 | 43 | +2.4 | 38.7 |
| 24 | Mississippi | $86,078,447 | $55,150,876 | $38,365,912 | 44.6% | $47,712,535 | 31 | +1.7 | 34.7 |
| 25 | Nebraska | $64,005,718 | $41,811,270 | $28,044,165 | 43.8% | $35,961,553 | 41 | +2.4 | 42.8 |
| 26 | Colorado | $104,773,554 | $67,541,818 | $45,343,887 | 43.3% | $59,429,667 | 26 | +4.7 | 43.9 |
| 27 | Oklahoma | $81,646,606 | $45,152,278 | $35,326,259 | 43.3% | $46,320,347 | 36 | +0.2 | 42.0 |
| 28 | Wyoming | $58,426,481 | $38,439,470 | $24,290,205 | 41.6% | $34,136,276 | 47 | +0.1 | 39.0 |
| 29 | Alabama | $97,943,015 | $62,321,201 | $40,445,138 | 41.3% | $57,497,877 | 29 | +2.8 | 31.0 |
| 30 | South Dakota | $60,010,454 | $39,313,136 | $24,607,470 | 41.0% | $35,402,984 | 46 | +4.5 | 44.2 |
| 31 | Hawaii | $62,021,957 | $40,354,303 | $25,088,975 | 40.5% | $36,932,982 | 44 | +0.2 | 46.4 |
| 32 | New York | $501,587,385 | $324,121,120 | $202,386,144 | 40.4% | $299,201,241 | 3 | +5.9 | 43.2 |
| 33 | New Mexico | $74,488,805 | $48,146,700 | $30,010,798 | 40.3% | $44,478,007 | 39 | +3.9 | 42.7 |
| 34 | Tennessee | $116,929,549 | $74,305,236 | $46,197,648 | 39.5% | $70,731,901 | 25 | +4.9 | 37.7 |
| 35 | Minnesota | $97,012,596 | $62,821,391 | $36,967,204 | 38.1% | $60,045,392 | 34 | +2.5 | 42.2 |
| 36 | Iowa | $96,102,644 | $62,767,651 | $36,370,101 | 37.9% | $59,732,543 | 35 | +2.5 | 43.1 |
| 37 | Wisconsin | $79,125,677 | $37,216,455 | $29,488,559 | 37.3% | $49,637,118 | 40 | +7.6 | 37.7 |
| 38 | Maryland | $198,404,958 | $129,183,350 | $70,947,075 | 35.8% | $127,457,883 | 11 | +2.1 | 46.2 |
| 39 | Louisiana | $113,071,405 | $72,467,363 | $40,021,885 | 35.4% | $73,049,520 | 30 | +6.0 | 39.4 |
| 40 | Massachusetts | $168,591,178 | $109,456,099 | $58,756,814 | 34.9% | $109,834,364 | 17 | +1.8 | 41.6 |
| 41 | Indiana | $99,087,725 | $63,335,598 | $33,522,533 | 33.8% | $65,565,192 | 38 | +2.1 | 44.6 |
| 42 | Nevada | $112,956,523 | $73,388,291 | $37,703,664 | 33.4% | $75,252,859 | 33 | +3.6 | 41.9 |
| 43 | Oregon | $83,501,226 | $53,593,337 | $27,838,093 | 33.3% | $55,663,133 | 42 | +0.8 | 42.1 |
| 44 | Delaware | $60,973,103 | $19,577,177 | $19,430,505 | 31.9% | $41,542,598 | 49 | +3.3 | 38.2 |
| 45 | Virginia | $230,435,003 | $149,748,660 | $72,518,733 | 31.5% | $157,916,270 | 10 | +1.0 | 40.8 |
| 46 | Washington | $163,460,354 | $105,712,019 | $49,611,685 | 30.4% | $113,848,669 | 23 | +9.0 | 37.9 |
| 47 | Missouri | $94,855,803 | $60,455,450 | $25,017,572 | 26.4% | $69,838,231 | 45 | +2.7 | 42.0 |
| 48 | New Jersey | $255,197,631 | $79,371,395 | $63,456,935 | 24.9% | $191,740,696 | 13 | +5.6 | 36.5 |
| 49 | Arkansas | $81,621,691 | $24,021,112 | $18,225,834 | 22.3% | $63,395,857 | 50 | +0.2 | 39.6 |
| 50 | District of Columbia | $62,027,062 | $19,804,007 | $3,895,113 | 6.3% | $58,131,949 | 51 | +0.0 | 30.1 |
| 51 | Texas | $472,094,133 | $134,488,297 | $23,750,972 | 5.0% | $448,343,161 | 48 | +1.7 | 32.7 |
† Ohio. Treasury’s March 2026 table prints Ohio’s deployed funds as $8,018,791, which is inconsistent with the 75.5% and 48.3% the same row prints and with the table’s own total. We use $88,018,791, which reproduces both printed percentages and Ohio’s December 2025 figure of $87,677,074; the reasoning is in the method section.
The five territories
Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa and the Northern Mariana Islands hold $340.0m between them and had deployed $79.2m (23.3%) at March 31, 2026. They signed their allocation agreements later than most states and are compared with each other here rather than ranked against the states.
| Territory | Agreement date | Allocation | Disbursed | Deployed (EOT) | Deployed, % of allocation | Remaining allocation | Change vs Dec 2025 (pts) | Row in Treasury’s 56-row table |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guam | 2 Dec 2022 | $58,669,922 | $19,081,492 | $18,758,572 | 32.0% | $39,911,350 | +4.1 | 44 of 56 |
| U.S. Virgin Islands | 27 Jan 2023 | $57,860,549 | $38,097,449 | $16,710,910 | 28.9% | $41,149,639 | +0.1 | 48 of 56 |
| American Samoa | 5 Mar 2024 | $57,082,769 | $18,739,909 | $16,255,898 | 28.5% | $40,826,871 | +3.7 | 49 of 56 |
| Puerto Rico | 8 Feb 2023 | $109,373,069 | $29,993,692 | $23,218,829 | 21.2% | $86,154,240 | +5.4 | 53 of 56 |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 16 Jul 2024 | $57,057,763 | $18,734,528 | $4,224,277 | 7.4% | $52,833,486 | +5.5 | 54 of 56 |
Three quarters, 56 jurisdictions
The combined totals for the same 56 jurisdictions in the last three Treasury reports. Treasury’s own headline (“over $3.9 billion” at March 31, 2026) is larger because it includes Tribal governments, whose deployment is not published by jurisdiction.
| Reporting period end | Treasury report posted | Allocation (56) | Disbursed | Deployed (EOT) | Deployed, % of allocation | Change in deployed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2025 | January 22, 2026 | $8,378,825,067 | $4,831,750,817 | $3,250,358,654 | 38.8% | — |
| December 31, 2025 | May 12, 2026 | $8,378,825,067 | $5,040,845,736 | $3,617,273,909 | 43.2% | $366.9m (+11.3%) |
| March 31, 2026 | July 9, 2026 | $8,378,825,067 | $5,565,043,383 | $3,858,941,292 | 46.1% | $241.7m (+6.7%) |
Largest quarter gains, dollars
- New York $29.4m
- California $17.1m
- Washington $14.7m
- New Jersey $14.2m
- Florida $11.6m
Largest quarter gains, percentage points
- Washington +9.0 pts
- Kentucky +8.0 pts
- Wisconsin +7.6 pts
- Idaho +6.8 pts
- Louisiana +6.0 pts
How these numbers were produced
What SSBCI is. The State Small Business Credit Initiative is a Treasury programme, reauthorised in 2021 with nearly $10 billion, that funds small-business financing programmes (loan participations, loan guarantees, collateral support, capital access and equity/venture programmes) and technical assistance run by states, territories and Tribal governments. Treasury disburses each jurisdiction’s Capital Program allocation in three tranches, each released on the basis of funds already deployed. This page covers the Capital Programs only; technical-assistance grants are a separate Treasury table and are not included.
Source. U.S. Department of the Treasury, SSBCI Quarterly Report through March 31, 2026 (dated June 29, 2026, posted July 9, 2026; sha256 51229b4f86bde238…), Figure 5, the summary table of every jurisdiction required to report, and the two preceding reports (through December 31, 2025 and through September 30, 2025) for the comparison columns. Treasury’s reports are on its programme reports page. Every dollar figure on this page is a cell in those tables; each report’s hash is recorded in the manifest so the exact files can be identified.
What “deployed” means. Treasury’s reports count funds as deployed when they are expended, obligated or transferred (“EOT”) as those terms are defined in section III.b of the Capital Program Policy Guidelines. Expended funds support loans or investments or pay administrative expenses; obligated funds are committed in writing, including to intermediaries; transferred funds have been passed to a contracting entity. EOT therefore includes obligations to venture funds that have not yet been invested in a business, and administrative costs. It is not the same as dollars lent or invested in small businesses, and this page never calls it “money spent”. Treasury states that the deployment data are as reported by the jurisdictions, may be under review, have not been verified by Treasury and may be revised.
Population. Treasury’s Figure 5 lists 56 jurisdictions: the 50 states, the District of Columbia and five territories, all reporting on the same date. It excludes Tribal governments (Treasury publishes their allocations, $571.0m in total, but not their deployment by jurisdiction) and any jurisdiction not yet required to report. The ranked scorecard is the 50 states plus DC (51). The territories carry the same metrics but are ranked only within Treasury’s 56-row order, because their allocations sit at the statutory minimum and their agreements were signed later than most states’. The 56-row totals reconcile to Treasury’s printed totals to within $5.
Calculations. Deployed, % of allocation = allocated funds deployed ÷ total allocation, computed from the dollar cells at full precision and shown to one decimal; every one of the 168 recomputed percentages across the three reports matches Treasury’s printed figure, and our exact-value ordering reproduces Treasury’s row order in all three. Remaining allocation = allocation − deployed. Share of reported deployment = a jurisdiction’s deployed funds ÷ the 56-row total. Months since agreement = days from the allocation agreement date to the period end ÷ 30.44. Ranks are on exact values; there are no ties. Quarter changes subtract the December 31, 2025 cell from the March 31, 2026 cell for the same jurisdiction; allocations are identical across the three reports.
The Ohio cell. In the March 2026 table Treasury prints Ohio’s deployed funds as $8,018,791. That figure is 4.4% of Ohio’s allocation, but the same row prints 48.3%; it is 6.9% of disbursed funds against a printed 75.5%; and with it the 56 rows sum to $80.0 million less than Treasury’s printed total. Ohio reported $87,123,774 at September 30, 2025 and $87,677,074 at December 31, 2025. Restoring a dropped leading digit gives $88,018,791, which reproduces both printed percentages to the decimal and brings the column total to within $5 of Treasury’s. We publish that figure, flag it in the table, and will replace it with Treasury’s own number if a corrected report appears.
Cross-checks. The headline facts Treasury states in the text of each report — California as the largest deployer and its rounded dollar figure, Alaska and Montana as the two highest shares and their percentages, the “over $8.9 billion” of allocations and the “over $3.9 billion” deployed — all reproduce from the parsed tables. Where the report’s charts carry a text layer (the September 2025 report), all 40 values of its top-40 chart and all 20 of its top-20 chart reproduce from our extract. The whole derivation was re-run in a second, independent implementation (a different PDF library, a different table parser, vectorised recomputation, and hand-typed anchor values from the tables) before publication; every published cell matched.
Reproducing and updating it. The three reports are public and the derivation is deterministic. Method version 1.0, 5 September 2026. This page is a living scorecard: at each new Treasury quarterly report the table and charts are refreshed for the new period, the reporting date above changes, and the previous file stays available at its own dated URL. Numbers on this page are never silently rewritten.
What these numbers cannot tell you
- Deployed is not lent. EOT includes funds obligated to venture funds and intermediaries that have not yet reached a business, and administrative expenses. It is not a measure of small-business loan or investment volume.
- The figures are self-reported and revisable. Treasury publishes what jurisdictions report and says the data have not been verified and may be revised. A later report can restate an earlier quarter.
- Timing differs. Allocation agreements were signed between May 2022 and July 2024. A jurisdiction that signed later has had less time; the months column is there for that reason, and the pace-per-month figure in the CSV is a simple ratio, not a forecast.
- Programme design differs. Equity and venture programmes tend to obligate large sums at once when a fund closes; loan-guarantee and collateral programmes deploy in many small steps. Structure moves a percentage as much as effort does.
- Dollars and percentages measure different things. A high share of a $57 million allocation is tens of millions; a low share of Texas’s $472.1m is still $23.8m. Read the two ranks together.
- Allocations are not comparable across jurisdictions. They were set by formula (with a statutory minimum) and include incentive allocations that are released only as deployment to underserved businesses is demonstrated, which is why disbursed and allocated differ.
- Tribal governments are missing from every ranking here. Treasury reports their allocations but not their deployment by jurisdiction, so they cannot be placed in this table; the national headline includes them, this table does not.
- One date. Everything on this page is a snapshot at the reporting date shown, with two prior snapshots for comparison. It says nothing about outcomes for businesses, jobs, or private capital leveraged.
- Description, not judgement. A low or high share is a reported fact about pace to date. Nothing here identifies why a jurisdiction sits where it does, and no figure on this page should be read as an assessment of any programme or administration.
Downloads
Reuse and citation
You are welcome to reproduce any figure, chart or table on this page in reporting, research or educational material, with attribution and a link back to this page. No permission request is needed. The CSVs above are the complete dataset, including the earlier snapshots.
Treasury facts — what SSBCI is, what deployed means, the allocations and the reported totals — should be cited to Treasury’s report; the percentages, ranks, remaining balances and quarter changes are Fundur’s analysis of that report. If a figure here contradicts one you have published, check the method above first; the source tables are public.
Every source on this page
- U.S. Department of the Treasury — SSBCI Quarterly Report through March 31, 2026 · Figure 5 summary table; dated June 29, 2026, posted July 9, 2026
- U.S. Department of the Treasury — SSBCI Quarterly Report through December 31, 2025 · Figure 5; posted May 12, 2026
- U.S. Department of the Treasury — SSBCI Quarterly Report through September 30, 2025 · Figure 5; dated December 15, 2025, posted January 22, 2026
- U.S. Department of the Treasury — SSBCI Capital Program Policy Guidelines · section III.b, the definitions of expended, obligated and transferred
- U.S. Department of the Treasury — SSBCI programme reports · index of quarterly reports
- Fundur downloads — scorecard as of March 31, 2026, snapshot December 31, 2025, snapshot September 30, 2025 · CSV, 56 rows each
Fundur is a financing marketplace, not a lender, and SSBCI funds reach businesses through state programmes and their participating lenders, not through Fundur. For where a state’s businesses actually borrow, our business loans by state hub covers every state; for SBA lending by state see SBA lending by state and by trade SBA lending by industry; national context is on small business lending statistics.
See what you qualify for →