Reference data

SSBCI capital deployment by state

How much of its State Small Business Credit Initiative allocation each state, the District of Columbia and each territory has deployed, how that compares with the dollars Treasury has disbursed to it, and how the picture moved over the last two quarters — for all 56 jurisdictions Treasury reports on. Every figure is computed from Treasury’s quarterly reports, and the whole table is downloadable.

Reporting period: cumulative through March 31, 2026 (Treasury report posted July 9, 2026). 56 jurisdictions: 50 states, DC, 5 territories; Tribal governments excluded (Treasury publishes their allocations only). “Deployed” is Treasury’s expended, obligated or transferred measure. Published 5 September 2026 · Version 1. Refreshed at each Treasury quarterly report; earlier snapshots stay downloadable.

$8.38bntotal SSBCI Capital Program allocation across the 56 jurisdictions, of which Treasury had disbursed $5.57bn
$3.86bnreported deployed (expended, obligated or transferred) — 46.1% of allocation, 69.3% of the funds disbursed
43.3%median share of allocation deployed among the 50 states and DC; range 5.0% (Texas) to 99.3% (Alaska)
$241.7mincrease in reported deployment over the quarter (6.7%), following 11.3% the quarter before
Key findings

Scale and pace are different questions

A state can lead on dollars deployed and sit mid-table on the share of its allocation, or the reverse. Both rankings are shown throughout; neither is a “best state” score. Every statement below is computed from Treasury’s tables — the method and its limits are set out further down.

99.3%
Highest share of allocation deployed: Alaska. Alaska (99.3%) and Montana (97.4%) have deployed almost all of their allocations; both had drawn every dollar of their allocation from Treasury by the reporting date. New Hampshire (91.7%) is third. All three hold allocations near the programme minimum, so a high percentage there represents roughly $55–60 million.
$743.0m
Most dollars deployed: California. Its $743.0m is 19.3% of every dollar the 56 jurisdictions report as deployed, from an allocation of $1.18bn (62.9% deployed). The five largest deployers — California, Florida, New York, Illinois, North Carolina — account for 41.6% of the total.
43.3%
The median state has deployed 43.3% of its allocation. Across the 50 states and DC the range runs from 5.0% to 99.3%; 17 of 51 are at or above 50% and 4 are below 25%. The combined figure for the 51 is 47.0%, and 46.1% for all 56 jurisdictions including the territories.
5.0%
Lowest share of allocation deployed: Texas, 51 of 51. Texas holds the second-largest allocation ($472.1m) and had reported $23.8m deployed at March 31, 2026, leaving $448.3m of allocation not yet reported as deployed — the largest remaining balance of any jurisdiction. Its allocation agreement was signed in July 2023, 32.7 months before the reporting date and later than most states; deployment rose from 1.8% in September 2025 to 3.3% in December 2025 and 5.0% in March 2026, a quarter gain of $8.1m. Texas ranks 48 of 51 by dollars deployed.
$241.7m
Reported deployment rose $241.7m (6.7%) in the quarter to $3.86bn across the 56 jurisdictions, and $608.6m (18.7%) over the two quarters since September 2025. New York added the most dollars ($29.4m); Washington added the most percentage points (+9.0 pts). Two jurisdictions reported no change in deployed funds across both quarters: West Virginia and District of Columbia.
23.3%
The five territories have deployed 23.3% of their combined $340.0m. Their agreement dates run from December 2022 (Guam) to July 2024 (Northern Mariana Islands), so they are compared with each other in a separate table rather than ranked against the states.
Pace

Share of allocation deployed, 50 states and DC

Sorted from the highest share to the lowest. The dashed line is the combined figure for the 51. Territories are charted with the states in the scale-against-pace view below and tabled separately.

Share of SSBCI allocation reported deployed, 50 states and DC, as of March 31, 2026 Horizontal bars, one per jurisdiction, sorted from highest to lowest share of allocation deployed. Alaska leads at 99.3% and Texas is lowest at 5.0%; the dashed line marks the combined 51-jurisdiction figure of 47.0%. The scorecard table below carries the same values. 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 51 combined 47.0% Alaska 99.3% Montana 97.4% New Hampshire 91.7% Maine 86.3% Idaho 84.6% North Carolina 81.9% Vermont 74.6% West Virginia 64.8% Florida 64.1% South Carolina 63.8% California 62.9% Utah 61.1% North Dakota 58.0% Kansas 54.4% Georgia 53.7% Kentucky 52.3% Illinois 50.6% Michigan 49.8% Arizona 48.6% Ohio 48.3% Connecticut 46.9% Pennsylvania 46.7% Rhode Island 45.1% Mississippi 44.6% Nebraska 43.8% Colorado 43.3% Oklahoma 43.3% Wyoming 41.6% Alabama 41.3% South Dakota 41.0% Hawaii 40.5% New York 40.4% New Mexico 40.3% Tennessee 39.5% Minnesota 38.1% Iowa 37.9% Wisconsin 37.3% Maryland 35.8% Louisiana 35.4% Massachusetts 34.9% Indiana 33.8% Nevada 33.4% Oregon 33.3% Delaware 31.9% Virginia 31.5% Washington 30.4% Missouri 26.4% New Jersey 24.9% Arkansas 22.3% District of Columbia 6.3% Texas 5.0%
Fundur analysis of U.S. Treasury, SSBCI Quarterly Report through March 31, 2026, Figure 5. Deployed = expended, obligated or transferred (EOT), as reported by each jurisdiction. The same values, sortable, are in the scorecard table.
Scale against pace

Allocation size against share deployed

Allocations run from about $57 million (the statutory minimum) to $1.18bn. The minimum-allocation group spans the whole range of deployment shares, which is why the two rankings on this page disagree so often.

Scale against pace: total SSBCI allocation (log scale) against share deployed, 56 jurisdictions, as of March 31, 2026 Scatter plot. Horizontal axis: total allocation from $50 million to $1.5 billion on a logarithmic scale. Vertical axis: share of allocation reported deployed, 0 to 100 percent. Filled circles are the 50 states and DC; hollow circles are the five territories. The smallest allocations (about $57 to $72 million, the statutory minimum group) span the whole vertical range, from Alaska at 99.3% to Northern Mariana Islands at 7.4%; among the four largest allocations, California ($1.18bn) sits at 62.9% and Texas ($472.1m) at 5.0%. Every point is listed in the tables below. 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% $50m $100m $250m $500m $1bn Total allocation (log scale) Deployed, % of allocation AK MT NH ME ID NC VT WV FL SC CA UT ND KS GA KY IL MI AZ OH CT PA RI MS NE CO OK WY AL SD HI NY NM TN MN IA WI MD LA MA IN NV OR GU DE VA WA VI AS MO NJ AR PR MP DC TX State or DC Territory
Fundur analysis of Treasury Figure 5, as of March 31, 2026. Horizontal axis is logarithmic. Labels are postal abbreviations; hollow markers are territories. Full values for every point are in the tables below.
Scorecard

All 50 states and DC, as of March 31, 2026

Dollar columns are Treasury’s cells; the percentage, remaining allocation, both ranks, the quarter change and the months column are computed. Rank by % orders jurisdictions by the share of allocation deployed; rank by $ by dollars deployed. Remaining allocation is allocation minus deployed — it is not undisbursed cash.

Click a column heading to sort. Territories are in the next table.
SSBCI capital deployment scorecard, 50 states and the District of Columbia, as of March 31, 2026. Sorted by share of allocation deployed, highest first.
1Alaska$59,905,891$59,905,891$59,488,94699.3%$416,94516+1.142.1
2Montana$61,327,969$61,327,969$59,739,54697.4%$1,588,42315+2.243.8
3New Hampshire$61,468,436$61,468,436$56,385,51991.7%$5,082,91718+0.346.0
4Maine$62,232,918$62,232,918$53,724,78786.3%$8,508,13122+2.545.0
5Idaho$65,677,548$64,702,291$55,567,24784.6%$10,110,30120+6.842.3
6North Carolina$201,897,680$165,309,034$165,306,67381.9%$36,591,0075+0.044.2
7Vermont$57,947,977$57,947,977$43,254,76974.6%$14,693,20827+1.144.4
8West Virginia$72,104,798$46,705,930$46,705,93064.8%$25,398,86824+0.046.2
9Florida$488,486,572$313,257,735$313,257,73564.1%$175,228,8372+2.441.1
10South Carolina$101,342,659$64,624,044$64,623,92963.8%$36,718,73012+1.945.7
11California$1,181,997,613$1,174,997,613$743,039,87962.9%$438,957,7341+1.442.4
12Utah$69,006,000$69,006,000$42,162,12461.1%$26,843,87628+0.341.2
13North Dakota$58,641,843$38,569,622$34,003,33558.0%$24,638,50837+0.941.6
14Kansas$69,596,847$45,190,256$37,872,28454.4%$31,724,56332+1.146.0
15Georgia$199,616,860$127,194,892$107,265,77253.7%$92,351,0888+5.340.8
16Kentucky$117,122,549$75,347,741$61,222,33752.3%$55,900,21214+8.037.4
17Illinois$354,626,570$230,005,724$179,551,64650.6%$175,074,9244+2.939.9
18Michigan$236,990,950$150,574,451$118,048,14749.8%$118,942,8037+4.346.4
19Arizona$111,031,354$69,748,246$53,916,64748.6%$57,114,70721+2.345.5
20Ohio$182,347,892$116,599,695$88,018,791 48.3%$94,329,1019+0.242.1
21Connecticut$119,414,934$77,809,814$56,016,92846.9%$63,398,00619+4.345.5
22Pennsylvania$267,838,132$173,371,255$125,137,44346.7%$142,700,6896+3.744.4
23Rhode Island$61,726,320$40,433,719$27,832,51445.1%$33,893,80643+2.438.7
24Mississippi$86,078,447$55,150,876$38,365,91244.6%$47,712,53531+1.734.7
25Nebraska$64,005,718$41,811,270$28,044,16543.8%$35,961,55341+2.442.8
26Colorado$104,773,554$67,541,818$45,343,88743.3%$59,429,66726+4.743.9
27Oklahoma$81,646,606$45,152,278$35,326,25943.3%$46,320,34736+0.242.0
28Wyoming$58,426,481$38,439,470$24,290,20541.6%$34,136,27647+0.139.0
29Alabama$97,943,015$62,321,201$40,445,13841.3%$57,497,87729+2.831.0
30South Dakota$60,010,454$39,313,136$24,607,47041.0%$35,402,98446+4.544.2
31Hawaii$62,021,957$40,354,303$25,088,97540.5%$36,932,98244+0.246.4
32New York$501,587,385$324,121,120$202,386,14440.4%$299,201,2413+5.943.2
33New Mexico$74,488,805$48,146,700$30,010,79840.3%$44,478,00739+3.942.7
34Tennessee$116,929,549$74,305,236$46,197,64839.5%$70,731,90125+4.937.7
35Minnesota$97,012,596$62,821,391$36,967,20438.1%$60,045,39234+2.542.2
36Iowa$96,102,644$62,767,651$36,370,10137.9%$59,732,54335+2.543.1
37Wisconsin$79,125,677$37,216,455$29,488,55937.3%$49,637,11840+7.637.7
38Maryland$198,404,958$129,183,350$70,947,07535.8%$127,457,88311+2.146.2
39Louisiana$113,071,405$72,467,363$40,021,88535.4%$73,049,52030+6.039.4
40Massachusetts$168,591,178$109,456,099$58,756,81434.9%$109,834,36417+1.841.6
41Indiana$99,087,725$63,335,598$33,522,53333.8%$65,565,19238+2.144.6
42Nevada$112,956,523$73,388,291$37,703,66433.4%$75,252,85933+3.641.9
43Oregon$83,501,226$53,593,337$27,838,09333.3%$55,663,13342+0.842.1
44Delaware$60,973,103$19,577,177$19,430,50531.9%$41,542,59849+3.338.2
45Virginia$230,435,003$149,748,660$72,518,73331.5%$157,916,27010+1.040.8
46Washington$163,460,354$105,712,019$49,611,68530.4%$113,848,66923+9.037.9
47Missouri$94,855,803$60,455,450$25,017,57226.4%$69,838,23145+2.742.0
48New Jersey$255,197,631$79,371,395$63,456,93524.9%$191,740,69613+5.636.5
49Arkansas$81,621,691$24,021,112$18,225,83422.3%$63,395,85750+0.239.6
50District of Columbia$62,027,062$19,804,007$3,895,1136.3%$58,131,94951+0.030.1
51Texas$472,094,133$134,488,297$23,750,9725.0%$448,343,16148+1.732.7

† Ohio. Treasury’s March 2026 table prints Ohio’s deployed funds as $8,018,791, which is inconsistent with the 75.5% and 48.3% the same row prints and with the table’s own total. We use $88,018,791, which reproduces both printed percentages and Ohio’s December 2025 figure of $87,677,074; the reasoning is in the method section.

Territories

The five territories

Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa and the Northern Mariana Islands hold $340.0m between them and had deployed $79.2m (23.3%) at March 31, 2026. They signed their allocation agreements later than most states and are compared with each other here rather than ranked against the states.

SSBCI capital deployment, five territories, as of March 31, 2026.
TerritoryAgreement dateAllocationDisbursedDeployed (EOT)Deployed, % of allocationRemaining allocationChange vs Dec 2025 (pts)Row in Treasury’s 56-row table
Guam2 Dec 2022$58,669,922$19,081,492$18,758,57232.0%$39,911,350+4.144 of 56
U.S. Virgin Islands27 Jan 2023$57,860,549$38,097,449$16,710,91028.9%$41,149,639+0.148 of 56
American Samoa5 Mar 2024$57,082,769$18,739,909$16,255,89828.5%$40,826,871+3.749 of 56
Puerto Rico8 Feb 2023$109,373,069$29,993,692$23,218,82921.2%$86,154,240+5.453 of 56
Northern Mariana Islands16 Jul 2024$57,057,763$18,734,528$4,224,2777.4%$52,833,486+5.554 of 56
Trend

Three quarters, 56 jurisdictions

The combined totals for the same 56 jurisdictions in the last three Treasury reports. Treasury’s own headline (“over $3.9 billion” at March 31, 2026) is larger because it includes Tribal governments, whose deployment is not published by jurisdiction.

Combined totals for the 56 non-Tribal jurisdictions across the last three Treasury quarterly reports.
Reporting period endTreasury report postedAllocation (56)DisbursedDeployed (EOT)Deployed, % of allocationChange in deployed
September 30, 2025January 22, 2026$8,378,825,067$4,831,750,817$3,250,358,65438.8%
December 31, 2025May 12, 2026$8,378,825,067$5,040,845,736$3,617,273,90943.2%$366.9m (+11.3%)
March 31, 2026July 9, 2026$8,378,825,067$5,565,043,383$3,858,941,29246.1%$241.7m (+6.7%)

Largest quarter gains, dollars

  1. New York $29.4m
  2. California $17.1m
  3. Washington $14.7m
  4. New Jersey $14.2m
  5. Florida $11.6m

Largest quarter gains, percentage points

  1. Washington +9.0 pts
  2. Kentucky +8.0 pts
  3. Wisconsin +7.6 pts
  4. Idaho +6.8 pts
  5. Louisiana +6.0 pts
Method

How these numbers were produced

What SSBCI is. The State Small Business Credit Initiative is a Treasury programme, reauthorised in 2021 with nearly $10 billion, that funds small-business financing programmes (loan participations, loan guarantees, collateral support, capital access and equity/venture programmes) and technical assistance run by states, territories and Tribal governments. Treasury disburses each jurisdiction’s Capital Program allocation in three tranches, each released on the basis of funds already deployed. This page covers the Capital Programs only; technical-assistance grants are a separate Treasury table and are not included.

Source. U.S. Department of the Treasury, SSBCI Quarterly Report through March 31, 2026 (dated June 29, 2026, posted July 9, 2026; sha256 51229b4f86bde238…), Figure 5, the summary table of every jurisdiction required to report, and the two preceding reports (through December 31, 2025 and through September 30, 2025) for the comparison columns. Treasury’s reports are on its programme reports page. Every dollar figure on this page is a cell in those tables; each report’s hash is recorded in the manifest so the exact files can be identified.

What “deployed” means. Treasury’s reports count funds as deployed when they are expended, obligated or transferred (“EOT”) as those terms are defined in section III.b of the Capital Program Policy Guidelines. Expended funds support loans or investments or pay administrative expenses; obligated funds are committed in writing, including to intermediaries; transferred funds have been passed to a contracting entity. EOT therefore includes obligations to venture funds that have not yet been invested in a business, and administrative costs. It is not the same as dollars lent or invested in small businesses, and this page never calls it “money spent”. Treasury states that the deployment data are as reported by the jurisdictions, may be under review, have not been verified by Treasury and may be revised.

Population. Treasury’s Figure 5 lists 56 jurisdictions: the 50 states, the District of Columbia and five territories, all reporting on the same date. It excludes Tribal governments (Treasury publishes their allocations, $571.0m in total, but not their deployment by jurisdiction) and any jurisdiction not yet required to report. The ranked scorecard is the 50 states plus DC (51). The territories carry the same metrics but are ranked only within Treasury’s 56-row order, because their allocations sit at the statutory minimum and their agreements were signed later than most states’. The 56-row totals reconcile to Treasury’s printed totals to within $5.

Calculations. Deployed, % of allocation = allocated funds deployed ÷ total allocation, computed from the dollar cells at full precision and shown to one decimal; every one of the 168 recomputed percentages across the three reports matches Treasury’s printed figure, and our exact-value ordering reproduces Treasury’s row order in all three. Remaining allocation = allocation − deployed. Share of reported deployment = a jurisdiction’s deployed funds ÷ the 56-row total. Months since agreement = days from the allocation agreement date to the period end ÷ 30.44. Ranks are on exact values; there are no ties. Quarter changes subtract the December 31, 2025 cell from the March 31, 2026 cell for the same jurisdiction; allocations are identical across the three reports.

The Ohio cell. In the March 2026 table Treasury prints Ohio’s deployed funds as $8,018,791. That figure is 4.4% of Ohio’s allocation, but the same row prints 48.3%; it is 6.9% of disbursed funds against a printed 75.5%; and with it the 56 rows sum to $80.0 million less than Treasury’s printed total. Ohio reported $87,123,774 at September 30, 2025 and $87,677,074 at December 31, 2025. Restoring a dropped leading digit gives $88,018,791, which reproduces both printed percentages to the decimal and brings the column total to within $5 of Treasury’s. We publish that figure, flag it in the table, and will replace it with Treasury’s own number if a corrected report appears.

Cross-checks. The headline facts Treasury states in the text of each report — California as the largest deployer and its rounded dollar figure, Alaska and Montana as the two highest shares and their percentages, the “over $8.9 billion” of allocations and the “over $3.9 billion” deployed — all reproduce from the parsed tables. Where the report’s charts carry a text layer (the September 2025 report), all 40 values of its top-40 chart and all 20 of its top-20 chart reproduce from our extract. The whole derivation was re-run in a second, independent implementation (a different PDF library, a different table parser, vectorised recomputation, and hand-typed anchor values from the tables) before publication; every published cell matched.

Reproducing and updating it. The three reports are public and the derivation is deterministic. Method version 1.0, 5 September 2026. This page is a living scorecard: at each new Treasury quarterly report the table and charts are refreshed for the new period, the reporting date above changes, and the previous file stays available at its own dated URL. Numbers on this page are never silently rewritten.

What these numbers cannot tell you

  • Deployed is not lent. EOT includes funds obligated to venture funds and intermediaries that have not yet reached a business, and administrative expenses. It is not a measure of small-business loan or investment volume.
  • The figures are self-reported and revisable. Treasury publishes what jurisdictions report and says the data have not been verified and may be revised. A later report can restate an earlier quarter.
  • Timing differs. Allocation agreements were signed between May 2022 and July 2024. A jurisdiction that signed later has had less time; the months column is there for that reason, and the pace-per-month figure in the CSV is a simple ratio, not a forecast.
  • Programme design differs. Equity and venture programmes tend to obligate large sums at once when a fund closes; loan-guarantee and collateral programmes deploy in many small steps. Structure moves a percentage as much as effort does.
  • Dollars and percentages measure different things. A high share of a $57 million allocation is tens of millions; a low share of Texas’s $472.1m is still $23.8m. Read the two ranks together.
  • Allocations are not comparable across jurisdictions. They were set by formula (with a statutory minimum) and include incentive allocations that are released only as deployment to underserved businesses is demonstrated, which is why disbursed and allocated differ.
  • Tribal governments are missing from every ranking here. Treasury reports their allocations but not their deployment by jurisdiction, so they cannot be placed in this table; the national headline includes them, this table does not.
  • One date. Everything on this page is a snapshot at the reporting date shown, with two prior snapshots for comparison. It says nothing about outcomes for businesses, jobs, or private capital leveraged.
  • Description, not judgement. A low or high share is a reported fact about pace to date. Nothing here identifies why a jurisdiction sits where it does, and no figure on this page should be read as an assessment of any programme or administration.

Downloads

Reuse and citation

You are welcome to reproduce any figure, chart or table on this page in reporting, research or educational material, with attribution and a link back to this page. No permission request is needed. The CSVs above are the complete dataset, including the earlier snapshots.

Treasury facts — what SSBCI is, what deployed means, the allocations and the reported totals — should be cited to Treasury’s report; the percentages, ranks, remaining balances and quarter changes are Fundur’s analysis of that report. If a figure here contradicts one you have published, check the method above first; the source tables are public.

Suggested citation: Fundur, “SSBCI Capital Deployment by State,” analysis of U.S. Treasury SSBCI quarterly reports through March 31, 2026, published 5 September 2026. https://fundur.com/resources/ssbci-deployment-by-state/
Sources

Every source on this page

Fundur is a financing marketplace, not a lender, and SSBCI funds reach businesses through state programmes and their participating lenders, not through Fundur. For where a state’s businesses actually borrow, our business loans by state hub covers every state; for SBA lending by state see SBA lending by state and by trade SBA lending by industry; national context is on small business lending statistics.

See what you qualify for